[ad_1]
Court News: Delhi High Court acquitted an accused in the 2004 murder case on Monday (June 19) after almost 19 years due to lack of evidence. This person was accused of destroying evidence in a murder case. While acquitting the man, the court said, "Despite having no incriminating evidence, this man faced trial for many years."
According to news agency PTI, the High Court said that the prosecution initially did not find any incriminating evidence against the man and even he was not named in the FIR or the preliminary charge sheet. Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma allowed Vijay Bahadur’s appeal challenging the lower court’s 2011 verdict. In which he was convicted of criminal conspiracy and destruction of evidence and sentenced to one year in jail.
Man acquitted in murder case after 19 years
The court observed that when the appellant and other co-accused were acquitted of the main charge of murder and the trial court came to the conclusion that the prosecution had failed to establish the guilt of Bahadur and others for murder, it was entitled to destroy the evidence. cannot be blamed.
What did the Delhi High Court say?
The Court noted that some unusual and interesting facts have emerged from the relevant judgment of the trial court and the most obvious one is that the supplementary charge sheet in the case against the appellant was filed on the oral direction of the trial court.
< pstyle="text-align: justify;">What is the whole matter?
It may be noted that in November 2004, a person lodged a complaint alleging that his driver went missing along with his car. The car was used for tourism. During investigation, the driver’s body was found and four people who had booked the taxi for the tour were arrested in 2004. Bahadur was arrested by the police in 2006.
Bahadur acquitted of all charges
The High Court, after considering the evidence placed on record, concluded that the evidence adduced by the prosecution was inherently insufficient to establish a solid basis for conviction. The Court observes that despite there being no incriminating evidence against the appellant, he has been convicted merely on the basis of a presumption. The appellant has faced trial for many years despite there being no evidence. Court acquits Vijay Bahadur of all charges.
Read also:
[ad_2]