[ad_1]
Political Reactions Over Film Adipurush: Delhi unit of BJP ‘disputed’ Until the scenes and dialogues were reviewed again, the film ‘Adipurush’ demanded a ban on the demonstration of Other parties, including the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), the Congress and the Shiv Sena (UBT), also criticized filmmaker Om Raut’s portrayal of Lord Hanuman in the film for allegedly hurting people’s sentiments.
Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Bhupesh Baghel went to the extent of saying that Bajrangbali’s mouth in the film used words used by Bajrang Dal. ‘Adipurush’ depicting the epic Ramayana on the big screen. Released in cinemas on Friday (June 16).
The film is facing criticism on social media regarding VFX effects and dialogues and ‘Lanka Dahan’. Its author Manoj Muntashir Shukla has come under attack from critics for the dialogue of Lord Hanuman in other scenes including.
BJP leader requests review from Information and Broadcasting Minister
Amidst the controversy, BJP’s Delhi unit spokesperson Praveen Shankar Kapoor has requested Union Information and Broadcasting Minister Anurag Thakur that the controversial scenes and dialogues of the film should be reviewed again.
He tweeted, ‘Honourable Anurag Thakur ji film ‘Adipurush’ There is opposition everywhere. Therefore, it is requested that its disputed scene and dialogue be reviewed again. The Board of Film Certification should temporarily suspend the censor certificate of this film. Its performance is suspended till further review.’’
Aam Aadmi Party reacts to the film ‘Adipurush’
Earlier in the day ‘you’ also criticized the film and said that BJP is supporting such a film which insults Lord Ram, Goddess Sita and Lord Hanuman.
Rajya Sabha member and AAP’s national spokesperson Sanjay Singh made these allegations while addressing a press conference at the party headquarters. He read out some dialogues from the film and termed them as a ‘grave insult’ to Lord Rama, Goddess Sita and Lord Hanuman as well as Hinduism.
Sanjay Singh claimed that the film is from Uttar Pradesh Yogi Adityanath, ‘with the blessings’ of Madhya Pradesh’s Shivraj Singh Chouhan, Haryana’s Manohar Lal Khattar, Assam’s Himanta Vishwa Sharma and Maharashtra’s Deputy Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis.
The AAP leader said, ‘‘Prime Minister Narendra Modi and BJP President JP Nadda should also apologize to the country and the entire Hindu society for allowing the production and screening of such a film, which hurt the sentiments of Hindus. Is. ’’
What else did CM Bhupesh Baghel say?
Bhupesh Baghel targets BJP
CM Baghel said, ‘‘Neither our forefathers have imagined such an image of Lord Hanuman nor does our society accept it.’’ Perhaps targeting the BJP without naming it, the Chief Minister said, “I want to ask why the political parties who become contractors of religion are silent on this matter.” Why are BJP leaders who have been giving statements on Kashmir files and Kerala story silent on ‘Adipurush’? ”
He said, “The dialogues and language in the film are limitless. In Tulsidas ji’s Ramayana, Lord Ram has been portrayed as Maryada Purushottam and civilized language has been used. The dialogues of the characters in Adipurush are very low.”
Congress spokesperson Supriya Shrinate said this
Congress spokesperson Supriya Shrinate termed the language of the film as ‘Tapori’ Wali and said that it hurts the sentiments of the people. He said, ‘‘ Lord Shri Hanuman is the epitome of gentleness and seriousness. In the year 1987, when Ramanand Sagar produced the Ramayana serial, then Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi had said that ‘Ramayana’ Illuminates the hearts and minds of millions of viewers. It propagates the great culture, tradition and ethics of India.’’
He said ‘‘ This is the difference between religion and the business of religion. You will get cheap popularity on the strength of your sycophancy, big shows are also available, but lack of talent definitely comes in the way. The one who called Hanuman as ‘tere baap ki jali’ Let me tell you, that writer is a squid, but Hindu is also very rude.’’
What is the reaction of Shiv Sena (UBT) on ‘Adipurush’?
Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Priyanka Chaturvedi said that film director Raut along with Muntashir should be featured in the film especially for Lord Hanuman. He should apologize to the people of the country for the dialogue.
Chaturvedi said, ‘‘The way language has been used for our deities in the name of entertainment hurts the sentiments of all Indians. If you are ‘Maryada Purushottam’ Making a film on Ram and breaking all norms to make a quick box office success is unacceptable.’’
What did Ramanand Sagar’s son Moti Sagar say?
The popular ‘Ramayana’ aired on Doordarshan; Moti Sagar, son of Ramanand Sagar, who was one of the directors of the serial, said that while bringing the mythological epic to the big screen, ‘Adipurush’ The makers of ‘Be More Vigilant’ wanted.
With father Ramanand Sagar and brother Prem Sagar in the year 1987 ‘Ramayan’ Moti Sagar, who has worked on the sets, said, ‘‘Looking at the dialogues I have read in the news and on Twitter, I can say that they should be careful.’’
Also read- ‘Insult to mother Sita and Ram for cheap politics’, AAP expresses displeasure over film Adipurush
[ad_2]